https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #6 from Antoni Boucher <bouanto at zoho dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5) > Well, only partly: PUSHQ works, but PUSH (no suffix) doesn't according to my > testing. Do you mean that gcc produces invalid asm when using the Intel syntax and should be using pushq? I was under the impression that suffixes like q was ATT syntax, but I couldn't find any reference of the intel syntax allowed in GNU as. It does seem to allow pushq even for the Intel syntax, though. Other assemblers allow "push qword". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
