https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://sourceware.org/bugz
| |illa/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
It turns out that static PIE with non-zero load address must have ET_EXEC:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
Otherwise, there is no way for loader to tell if the dynamic section entries
contain the relocated values for the load address or not. Since static PIE
with non-zero load address must have ET_EXEC, PIE with non-zero load address
also should have ET_EXEC.
BTW, gold doesn't support static PIE and static PIE with non-zero load address
generated by lld crashes with the fix glibc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
