https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33801
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> --- I think we should do exactly as the user asked rather than trying to save them from themselves. No special options required. I was dubious about the idea of not allowing editing of slim lto objects at the time HJ implemented it, but thought it was OK if there were no use cases where removing sections made sense. Now that we are aware that people do in fact want to remove lto sections in slim lto, I'm removing that safety net. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
