On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:30:33PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote: > Are you saying it has been changed in the later C++ revision?
Nope. I'm saying "std::" can't be claimed to be an issue here.
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:30:33PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote: > Are you saying it has been changed in the later C++ revision?
Nope. I'm saying "std::" can't be claimed to be an issue here.