On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > Has anyone suggested a name for the new macro? If not, how about this one? > > #define YYUCK(e) /* empty */
:) > OK, so I'm not entirely serious here. But what would the macro > actually be used for? I've lost context. For semantic values. See my previous post today. Does that help clarify? At one point I suggested YYBISON_USE. But now I'm wondering if something more specific like YYUSE_VAL might be clearer. Joel
