On 01/19/2011 12:13 AM, Alex Rozenman wrote: > it is impossible to obtain an unambiguous grammar with syntax extensions > like id '[' c_id ']' without involving the ';' requirement.
Yes, but that's OK; that's what I'm proposing. That is, I'm proposing that if a user wants to use the new syntax extensions, the user also must put ';' at the end of each rule. It's OK to require ';' for new grammars. Omitting ';' has been deprecated for many years, and no new grammars should be omitting ';'.
