> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Paul Hilfinger wrote: > > > The -Wnone option, > > contrary to the documentation, does NOT suppress all categories of > > warnings---in particular, not these. Perhaps its reach should be > > extended > > Please try bison 2.5, which has fixes for this bug.
This does fix the problem; thanks. > > , or there should be a category of destructor whose action > > really is intended by the programmer to be needed ONLY in case of error > > (so that it does not cause warnings)? > > Is simply disabling this warning for all destructors not sufficient? > That is, do you want the warnings for some destructors in the same > grammar? > > If not, then perhaps we should just have a new warning category so you > don't have to disable all categories of bison warnings in order to disable > this category. On reflection, I am reluctant to suggest adding features to accommodate somewhat obscure uses of the software. Until others start to get irritated with the warnings from use of destructors, I think that -Wnone and -Wno-other will suffice for my purposes. Paul Hilfinger
