Akim Demaille wrote:
> Installed in branch-2.5.
>
> Is there some standard in the gnulib universe on the names to
> give to the various branches? In Bison, master is the next major
> release, and we use branch-X.Y for the maintenance branches, but
> some version independent naming scheme would be fine.
You might like to follow git.git's example. They use branches named
after their function, rather than ones named after (imho)less-meaningful
numbers.
That seems more scalable in the long run:
maint
master
next
pu
todo
Otherwise, eventually you'll end up with many many branches,
all but a few of which are inactive.
