Re: [PATCH 10/11] quote consistently and make tests pass with new quoting from gnulib

[Paul Eggert]

On 02/08/2012 02:54 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> -        error (0, 0, _("missing operand after '%s'"), argv[argc - 1]);
> +        error (0, 0, _("%s: missing operand"), quotearg_colon (argv[argc - 
> 1]));
>        else
> -        error (0, 0, _("extra operand '%s'"), argv[optind + 1]);
> +        error (0, 0, _("extra operand %s"), quote (argv[optind + 1]));

This doesn't seem consistent: shouldn't both use quotearg_colon,
or neither?

Otherwise I didn't see a problem, in a quick perusal.