> Le 19 janv. 2015 à 11:44, Akim Demaille <a...@lrde.epita.fr> a écrit : > >> I've run the program named "list" in 426 from gdb with the attached script. >> Please see the attached output for backtraces at (hopefully) the relevant >> places. Please don't hesitate if something else from the debugger would be >> useful. > > Thanks for the traces! I don't have time to try to understand them > now, I'll try to address that in the near future.
Now I know what would be most interesting: debug traces! Could you please run the same test with YYDEBUG=1 set in the environment? YYDEBUG=1 make check TESTSUITEFLAGS='-d -v -x 426' The test will sure fail even more, but we should also get a better chance to compare my traces with yours. And spot when the spurious constructor was called.
