Hans Åberg wrote: > It is sort of strange in C++ to not have a header, and having > inlines not in those.
Sure, I think it was just a mistake. Bison puts inlines for some classes it uses internally (by_state, stack_symbol_type) in the C++ file, that's OK (though they don't really need the "inline" keyword then, since it doesn't mean "can be inlined", but "can be defined in several compilation units" in modern C++, but it doesn't hurt), and probably by accident they caught the syntax_error inline constructor, too. Regards, Frank
