Hans Åberg wrote: > > And I've explained why I didn't rename > > location.cc. If you disagree, please reply to those posts of mine. > > You said it is the same, but 'patch' reported it patched, and it > did not work with the original. So it should probably have a > different name to avoid confusion with the original.
It's the same between C++03 (old skeleton) and C++17 (new skeleton). The extra_header_prefix feature is independent of my new skeleton, I just used the example to demonstrate it. Regards, Frank
