> On 19 May 2019, at 12:58, Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de> wrote: > > Akim Demaille wrote: > >>> Le 19 mai 2019 à 11:02, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> a écrit : >>> >>> Also a spelling error: copiable. >> >> I'm installing this. Thanks a lot Hans! >> >> fix: use copiable, not copyable > > Am I missing something? Seems like "copyable" is a valid alternative > form: > > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/copiable > > and commonly used in C++: > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_trivially_copyable
It has varied historically, it seems [1]. I got it from NOAD/ODE only listing ‘copiable’, whereas AmH lists both. 1. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=copiable%2Ccopyable&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2Ccopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Ccopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopyable%3B%2Cc0#t4%3B%2Ccopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopiable%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2Ccopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bcopyable%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BCopyable%3B%2Cc0
