> Le 25 oct. 2019 à 18:13, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit :
>
> On 10/25/19 7:15 AM, Théophile Ranquet wrote:
>>
>> This sounds interesting and I would love reading what people have to
>> say about this. However, I have failed at finding any such discussion
>> or source. Could you perhaps share a few pointers?
>
>
> I don't know of a good central email thread about this, but here's a style
> guideline:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/C-Integer-Types.html
About C++, this page has a good summary of the trend, which is "run away from
unsigned".
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18795453/why-prefer-signed-over-unsigned-in-c
This talk is about undefined behavior, and why it's good to have some (in
particular because, as Paul already reported, this allows tools such as
sanitizers to catch these errors).
https://youtu.be/yG1OZ69H_-o
In particular from here, Chandler Carruth treats the case of unsigned/signed
(IIRC, I did not re-watch this talk).
https://youtu.be/yG1OZ69H_-o?t=1475
Eric Niebler, of BOOST_FOREACH and Range v3 fame, started a "thread" about
eliminating unsigneds from the C++ standard library V2.
https://github.com/ericniebler/stl2/issues/182
