Hello Akim, I am trying with 3.5.92 and I see now:
/Users/kumbhar/nmodl/src/parser/diffeq_context.cpp:81:75: error: no member named 'type_get' in 'nmodl::parser::DiffeqParser::by_kind' if (token_type == DiffeqParser::by_type(DiffeqParser::token::END).type_get()) { ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ The full example is here <https://github.com/BlueBrain/nmodl/blob/584af62be9cd6f9017f63e2d9cb732e1da58d420/src/parser/diffeq_context.cpp#L81>. Did* I* miss to point this out in my last email? Next time if you push the fix to the git repo, I can build bison from there and try it. Regards, Pramod On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 9:19 AM Akim Demaille <a...@lrde.epita.fr> wrote: > > > Le 3 mai 2020 à 09:10, pramod kumbhar <pramod.s.kumb...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > Hello Akim, > > > > Thank you very much for quick response and addressing this already! > > Sure :) > > > By the way, I was also confused when brew started shipping 3.5.91. I was > trying to find out if 3.5.91 is stable release or not and came across this > and this. By looking at the release tarballs here, it's not obvious which > one is beta vs which one is stable. Typically when we package new version > inside Spack, we often look at the release tarballs and add new version > (even automatically find one). I agree it's not good idea but I wouldn't be > surprised if such tarballs are perceived as stable releases. If this is > beta version, may be tarball name can indicate that? > > Heck, the mistake is mine... I uploaded it as a stable release, instead > of a beta :( > > So we should better hurry up and wrap 3.6 quite soon :( > > Thanks!