Hi Jot, > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 09:52, Jot Dot <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Have you looked at the examples in examples/c++? > > Yes. I can't see anything I'm doing different in that respect. btw: I've been > aware of lex/yacc for about 40 years (I'm a fossil) but, up till now, > preferred hand coding recursive decent parsers.
You mean recursive descent—Bison's parsers are pretty decent too. > > The definition of state_type depends on the grammar. What is your > > definition? > > Ahhh!!. I see, by putting in the second error token in the rule, the > definition for yytable_ changes from an initial > static const signed char > to: > static const short Right. > I think this is a possibility of a bug happening here. Just my luck. Things > like this just always happen to follow me around. I would very much like to have your grammar, so that I can check if there is really a danger or not. It is super unlikely that there is, but I would appreciate to be able to have a closer look. If you prefer, you can send me your grammar privately, and I promise I won't publish it. Cheers!
