Tim Spriggs wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I appreciate your work on this project :) > > cfservd compiles but I haven't tested it on Darwin. If there is > something in specific I can test (set of rules/client connections to > cfservd) I'll be happy to try it out.
If it compiles it should simply work else connections will fail. It's a binary thing. > Also, I tried compiling cfengine3 (trunk from svn) on Darwin (PowerPC) > and it failed with a really long list of undefined symbols for > cfpromises. I have the line and the big long list if you are interested. No thanks :) You can follow the trouble-shooting info. Compiling is trick at this phase. Next version will be simpler - remove the dependency on cfengine 2 which causes library ordering issues. > I'm somewhat surprised more people are not deploying IPv6 in the US. It > seems obvious to me that IPv4 and NAT is just bad news. The problem I > run into locally is that since it is not used anywhere locally, there is > no justification to support it. Go figure. NAT = Not a Technology. Lordy mamma, how I loathe it. M _______________________________________________ Bug-cfengine mailing list [email protected] https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
