Morten Werner Forsbring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I have made a change (Committed revision 524 which hopefully addresses
>> this. Could someone test it please?
>
> Sorry for this late answer:

[snip]

> So the patch seems to address the problem, thanks. :)

Hi again,

Chun Tian experience that the patch maybe have some side-effects that
I didn't notice. This is what he writes:

  Hi, Werner
  
  Worse bug invoked after this patch...
  
  I have this "editfiles" class definition:
  
  editfiles:
    { /etc/default/snmpd
      ReplaceFirst "^SNMPDOPTS.*$" With "SNMPDOPTS='-Lsd -Lf /dev/null -
  u snmp -I -smux -p /var/run/snmpd.pid ${global.ipv4[eth0]}:1185 $
  {global.ipv4[eth1]}'"
    }
  
  I found one of ${global.ipv4[eth0]} and ${global.ipv4[eth1]} cannot be
  expanded into right value, which depends my interfaces order on
  server.
  
  On one machine:
  
  img7-6:/etc/default# ip addr
  1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,10000> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
  1000
      link/ether 00:13:21:b5:70:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 222.185.245.186/25 brd 222.185.245.255 scope global eth0
      inet6 fe80::213:21ff:feb5:701a/64 scope link
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
  1000
      link/ether 00:13:21:b5:70:1b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 172.17.0.253/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global eth1
      inet 192.168.0.186/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1:0
      inet6 fe80::213:21ff:feb5:701b/64 scope link
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  4: tunl0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
      link/ipip 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
  5: dummy0: <BROADCAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
      link/ether 76:20:1a:97:49:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  6: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
      link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
  
  I got this result in /etc/default/snmpd:
  
  SNMPDOPTS='-Lsd -Lf /dev/null -u snmp -I -smux -p /var/run/snmpd.pid
  222.185.245.186:1185 ${global.ipv4[eth1]}'
  
  On another machine:
  
  img7-7:/etc/default# ip addr
  1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,10000> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      inet6 ::1/128 scope host
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  2: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
  1000
      link/ether 00:13:21:b5:70:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 172.17.0.254/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global eth1
      inet 192.168.0.187/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1:0
      inet6 fe80::213:21ff:feb5:70d6/64 scope link
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
  1000
      link/ether 00:13:21:b5:70:d7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 222.185.245.187/25 brd 222.185.245.255 scope global eth0
      inet6 fe80::213:21ff:feb5:70d7/64 scope link
         valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
  4: tunl0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
      link/ipip 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
  5: dummy0: <BROADCAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
      link/ether ae:5f:09:85:ed:24 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  6: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
      link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
  
  I got this result in /etc/default/snmpd:
  
  SNMPDOPTS='-Lsd -Lf /dev/null -u snmp -I -smux -p /var/run/snmpd.pid $
  {global.ipv4[eth0]}:1185 172.17.0.254'
  
  The difference of two machine is: the order of eth0 and eth1 is
  different! It's possible that eth1 appears behand eth0, I think the
  patch of cfengine didn't consider that.
  
  Hope this mail is useful for another fix of cfengine.
  
  Regards,
  
  Chun Tian (binghe)

I haven't had time to look at the code yet, do anyone else?


- Werner
_______________________________________________
Bug-cfengine mailing list
[email protected]
https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine

Reply via email to