"Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" wrote: > Hi, > > I am not agree to introduce another command, like lsb_release -a. > > uname is sufficient. > > Changing actual -d with the OS release name: FTOSX, RedHat, will solve > the matter.
I do not think anyone is claiming that lsb is prohibited from requiring uname to support -d. In fact, I would guess that other vendors would avoid adding -d to their unames, unless it were to be for the analagous purpose. Were multiple vendors to actually do that, *then* is the time to suggest a POSIX standard..... _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
