I believe that "CONFIG_LPD" must be a typo as it doesn't exist as an option. The author probably meant "CONFIG_LBD", which enables large block device support. All of my systems are already built with 'CONFIG_LBD".
I'm going to try posting this issue to the ext-users list. -J -- On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Most likely, then, the bug is not in "df" itself. I'd look for bugs > > in the underlying C library, or operating system, or file system, etc. > > 4.5 TB is just over 2**30 * 4096 bytes, so perhaps your file system > > can't handle more than 2**30 blocks for some reason. > > <http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html> says that Linux 2.4.x or Linux > 2.6.x without CONFIG_LPD can only handle block devices/file systems of 2TB > maximum on 32 bit platforms. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra�e 5, 90409 N�rnberg, Germany > Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." > _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
