On Mon, May 09, 2005, Paul Eggert wrote: > Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > + myargv[[0]] = "conftest"; > > + myargv[[1]] = "-+"; > > This doesn't null-terminate myargv.
D'oh ! > But I still don't get why the change is needed. It sounds like you're > assuming Solaris 11 getopt might get fixed? But even in that case, > the current code will work, right, since it will use GNU getopt? So > this is just an optimization for the hypothetical case if Solaris 11 > getopt gets fixed? In that case perhaps we should wait for Solaris 11 > and test it before installing this patch, as it's more likely to cause > a bug than to fix one. Well, it might still fail on other OSes, that also do not use GNU getopt. They do probably also not have the getopt_clip. I'll check this on IRIX, today. (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
