On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:33:41AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Can you please report this bug to whoever's responsible for getting > nanosleep to work in the Linux kernel, if the bug isn't already > fixed in more bleeding-edge versions? Works for me (i.e. returns 0) on a stock 2.6.17, but if you could keep an eye on it once the kernel in debian has reached something like 2.6.17 that would probably be prudent, just to make sure it's not something introduced by the debian patches. I'd test it on a stock 2.6.8 but I don't have one handy and the interaction between user-mode-linux host and guest nanosleep is a bit too muddy for me to trust it for testing this.
-- Frank v Waveren Key fingerprint: BDD7 D61E [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5D39 CF05 4BFC F57A Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/468D62C8 FA00 7D51 468D 62C8
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
