Paul Eggert wrote: > Sebastian Kreft writes: > > And finally, why do you use mempcpy instead of strncpy? > > A minor speed increase. mempcpy need not check for '\0'.
In general I am always happy to see strncpy() removed from code. It is a terrible library routine, named inconsistently with other strn*() routines, and just generally misunderstood. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
