Evan Hunt wrote:
I'm somewhat positive about the idea, but this particular name has the
problem that it's already used for other projects (or at least that is
what searching for the name on the web would imply).
Do you have an alternative to suggest? I've just googled through a whole
series of names--generalutils, genutils, gputils (for "general purpose"),
and several more, and there don't seem to be all that many short strings of
characters followed by "utils" that *haven't* been used as a project name
by someone.
What about coreutils-extra? (Would that be acceptable to the coreutils
folks?)
--
Matthew
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
