Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe we can finally excise the crufty code in those #else blocks. > Do any of you know of a "reasonable porting target" :-) that does > not define SA_NOCLDSTOP?
Neither Debian stable nor Solaris 10 defines SA_NOCLDSTOP if you compile with gcc -ansi. This is because the C Standard doesn't allow the implementation to declare SA_NOCLDSTOP in <signal.h>, due to name space considerations. One could easily argue that this is simply a botch in the standard, but it's a common enough botch that I expect we'll run into it. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
