Phillip Susi wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > It would need to be an active participant in the I/O. > > It has no need to be an active participant in the IO; it just needs to > change the name it passes to open() when it sets up the file descriptors > prior to exec().
Uhm... I think we drifted from the feature discussion: Jack van de Vossenberg wrote: > My request is: could the output be preceded by > 1) the name/PID of the process that produces the output. > 2) the time that the output was produced. I don't think that is possible without an active participation by a process. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
