On Wednesday 27 June 2007 23:39, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's probably going overboard, but some application might > even want to call fsync on each containing directory.
I expect that the overhead of calling fsync on the directory is negligible compared to the overhead of calling it on the files. So it might be best to just have a single option. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
