Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > This point I can agree with. --group-directories-first is relatively new, > and since it is currently silent about behavior on links, I have no > problem with changing that behavior; however, I would insist that if we > make a change, we add test cases and documentation to lock in that > behavior for the future.
Yes. If someone were to prepare a complete patch, (i.e., one that I can simply "git pull ..." or apply with "git am", updating NEWS, coreutils.texi, and ls.c's usage (to adjust ls' --help)) that would make a fine point for further discussion. Code speaks more loudly than words. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
