Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering how such an implementation would possibly look like. > But before I dig into the code again, some clarification on the specifics > of expected behavior would be regarded helpful. > > Would such a change allow for repeated items such as > > $ seq -f "a" 5 > a > a > a > a > a
Thanks for looking at it. Actually, I've just removed that TODO item. There are plenty of other ways to print a constant string repeatedly, so changing seq to allow this is not justified. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
