[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > This doesn't seem a particularly satisfying result as it doesn't seem > like a reasonable outcome.
Have you looked at the --count-links option? -l, --count-links count sizes many times if hard linked That behavior is optional, because people usually expect to get numbers that sum to the actual disk space used. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
