Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 3/20/2008 7:58 AM: > |> Here's stage 1 of the sync for coreutils. The patch looks big, but that's > |> due to how 'git format-patch' handles renames. > > I just learned 'git config --global diff.renames true' to make renaming > patches default to their more compact representation.
Thanks for the tip. > |> Once gnulib is further > |> fixed to dump GNUmakefile into the top directory, stage 2 would be using > |> the gnulib module rather than synchronizing the files. > > As follows. ... >>From bb003f7e035fab9a8c4e8dc6d0c5c945f48952f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:51:10 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH] Use new gnulib gnumakefile module. > > * bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Pull in new module. > * GNUmakefile: Remove from version control. > * .gitignore: Update. > * configure.ac (AC_CONFIG_LINKS): Delete; rely on gnulib to do > this now. > * Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST, distclean-local): Likewise. Thanks. Perfect ;-) Applied verbatim. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
