[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > JM> - document a subtle limitation encountered when using a losing file > system > It's the Lingua Franca of USB filesystem where I live. > > You change your comparison from > Modify: 2008-04-03 05:45:22.777777777 > to one second buckets > Modify: 2008-04-03 05:45:22 > so it should be just as easy to add a two second bucket too
Sorry, but as far as I know, it's not easy at all, in the context of cp. Keep this in perspective: i.e., what's the penalty for not changing the code to match the documentation? The second cp -u invocation in the right two-second interval will do some useless work. Not worth worrying about. > The Linux guys went through all the trouble to be able to write the > file into the two second bucket, and they you fellows don't follow > along: ah ha: GNU/Linux becomes GNU ... / ... Linux: a crack appears. Don't blame Linux ;-) This is due to the FAT specification. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
