Hauke Laging wrote:
Hello,
I just read an interesting hint in the German shell Usenet group
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). As I could not find anything about
that point in your mailing list archive I would like to mention it here.
The author claims that he achieved a huge performance increase (more than
factor 10) when copying a big amount of small files (1-10 KiB) by sorting
by inode numbers first. This probably reduces the disk access time which
becomes the dominating factor for small files.
It depends on what filesystem you are using. In ext3 this would help,
but not on reiserfs, where there is no relationship between inode number
and disk position.
In any case, this would significantly increase the complexity of cp for
at best, dubious gains, so it isn't likely to happen. Rather than sort
by inode, it would be better if filesystems that would benefit from that
would keep the directory list sorted that way so that the list would
already be sorted when passed to cp. IIRC, the defrag package sorts
directories this way on ext2/3.
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
