vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
The ls -s argument is documented as such:
ls --help output:
-s, --size print the size of each file, in blocks
LS(1) man page:
-s, --size
print the size of each file, in blocks
This leads one to expect some sort of relationship between the size
colum in ls -l output, perhaps with rounding to the nearest block, but
this is not the case.
I know the info is preferred, but would it be okay to simply
s/blocks/allocated blocks/? (or "used blocks", or something along those
lines?) I think it should be possible to make this a bit clearer in a
way that has an acceptable impact on the length of --help.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an
undocumented feature. -- Unknown (from fortune's bofh-excuses)
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
