Matthew Woehlke wrote: > ...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious > why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...) > > cc -c99 -g -Wl,--as-needed -o whoami whoami.o libver.a > ../lib/libcoreutils.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a > > (null): WARNING 1 : Unknown option: -as-needed (ignored). > > > ld32: WARNING 84 : ../lib/libcoreutils.a is not used for resolving any > symbol. > > > Doesn't seem to be a big problem, since 7.1.49 built okay and the > tests aren't failing spectacularly. > > What would be most useful, config.log?
If it doesn't cause any failure, it's not worth investigating or changing, since Irix is on the fringe. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
