Jim Meyering wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
If someone cares enough about HP's C compiler, they teach
autoconf to detect this limitation and automatically add an
appropriate -H option, presumably to raise its internal limit.
I'd love to help, but as mentioned, I have *no* idea how to feed
options to cc so that it passes them to cpp.
For you to get past this, try ./configure CPPFLAGS=-H...
where you choose the "..." part.
I finally found this in the cc manpage (it's mis-formated and
near-impossible to read; I missed it the first several times). Looks
like it needs '-Wp,-H,1048576'. No I didn't write that wrong, the macro
apparently expands to *over 180 kb*, and I'd like room to add one or two
items. (I decided to verify that with 'gcc -E'... and yup, it's around
200 kb. *Still* don't think that's excessive?)
Incidentally, this construct, which should produce the same result:
MAX (
MAX (
MAX (
O_APPEND,
MAX (O_BINARY, O_CIO)
),
MAX (
MAX (O_DIRECT, O_DIRECTORY),
MAX (O_DSYNC, O_NOATIME)
)
),
MAX (
MAX (
O_NOCTTY,
MAX (O_NOFOLLOW, O_NOLINKS)
),
MAX (
MAX (O_NONBLOCK, O_SYNC),
MAX (O_TEXT, 0)
)
)
)
...expands to a measly 2 kb.
/usr/include/wchar.h:54: warning: `WEOF' redefined
wchar.h:114: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from acl.h:20,
Ok. let's not go there ;-)
I'm just posting the full output :-). I agree this doesn't need to be
chased; apologies if I implied otherwise.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"Two IIRC's must make a right" -- Larry Hall (paraphrased)
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
