Paul Eggert wrote:
Matthew Woehlke writes:
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. :-)
Paul Eggert wrote:
+ if (total != UINTMAX_MAX)
Um... I've mentioned that this won't work, haven't I? AIX is (AFAICT)
giving 0xFFF...FFE, not 0xFFF...FFF.
The later patch (in that same message) adjusted that line to deal with
(uintmax_t) -2.
Ah, I see, I missed the second part (perhaps because it was disguised as
a really long .sig). Sorry :-). And thanks (again).
Maybe some other oddball system in the future will use (uintmax_t) -3?
(I was thinking of having df use (uintmax_t) -100, just to make the code
more future-proof. :-)
:-D
--
Matthew
--
"We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad... You must be, or you wouldn't
have come here." -- The Cheshire Cat (from Lewis Carroll's Alice in
Wonderland)
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
