Jim Meyering <[email protected]> writes: > > Thanks. I haven't looked, but after reading about the reflink syscall > [http://lwn.net/Articles/332802/] had come to the same conclusion: > this feature belongs with ln rather than with cp.
cp already has -l so it would make sense to extend that too. > Besides, putting the new behavior on a new option avoids > the current semantic change we would otherwise induce in cp. I don't see how semantics change in a user visible way. -Andi -- [email protected] -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
