Hi jidanni, I'm extremely angry about you forwarding my findings to the Debian BTS. Debian decided not to give me a vote again without passing a full NM procedure which I don't accept, hence: *I don't fix their bugs without having a vote*.
@ Debian's at maintainer, I hereby declare: *You are not allowed to use my findings for Debian.* No objection against the Cc to gnu though. On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 17:23 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > >> >> However to get at to accept such a date, one needs: > >> >> $ at -v $(date --rfc-3339=date -d 'now + 5 years + 11 months') > >> >> Fri Oct 17 03:56:00 2014 > >> >> warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh > > B'B> How do you like these: > B'B> at-ng/build% ./at now + 5 years + 11 months > B'B> Job will run at or after Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:26:00 +0200. > > B'B> It was a trivial fix adding just 2 lines to the grammar. > > I'll cc them to let them know... @jidanni Please don't cite me to anybody without my permission. I addressed jida...@jidanni.org, not 505927-submit...@bugs.d.o or even 505...@bugs.d.o, which you may be assured I am capable of. My goal is not to make Debian's at package better, but to offer an enhanced replacement via https://launchpad.net/~at-ng. Thanks Siggy ps: Do you grant me permission to cite you to at...@free-it.org, which obviously is an address for at-ng related stuff? -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org+ | 仅46天时间 |Open Source in Northern Germany: www.free-it.org| |www.Ubucon.de| tech contact: bsb-at-free-dash-it-dot-de| +-------> ceterum censeo javascriptum esse restrictam <--------+
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature