Pádraig Brady wrote: > Hmm. 0.2s was too short between writes so. > I've bumped it up to 0.5s since 0.2 failed so infrequently. > I've also changed to just skip on possible failure.
That should do it. Thanks.
Pádraig Brady wrote: > Hmm. 0.2s was too short between writes so. > I've bumped it up to 0.5s since 0.2 failed so infrequently. > I've also changed to just skip on possible failure.
That should do it. Thanks.