Eric Blake wrote: > Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com> writes: > >>> OK to apply? This test fails on Solaris 9 until you import the latest > gnulib. >> Test looks good. >> Should you test that `touch -h -d link2/` also dereferences symlink? >> If that's already tested elsewhere, ignore me. > > That exact test was what I used in the last few lines of the test as proposed.
Ah I missed the -h sorry. > Or were you thinking: > touch -h -r link2/ file > > picks up the timestamps of the directory, not the symlink, as the reference > timestamps used for altering file? Good idea; I'll squash that in before > committing. I can't claim that good idea :) cheers, Pádraig.
