On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:13:41 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> writes: > > Mike Frysinger writes: > >> --at-fd might be a better explicit option without getting too verbose ? > > > > Indeed. > > Note that the "at" in those functions is actually short for "attribute".
i wasnt aware of that, and the posix docs dont seem to use this word in any of the function descriptions. i dont think it matters much though with the longer proposed option as it still means "the fd given to the *at funcs". if anything, it makes it clearer as you wouldnt interpret it to mean "use these other AT options when calling *at funcs". -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
