On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:08:33 +0000 Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> wrote:
> 2010/3/10 Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com>: > > How about just doing: s/is usually/might be/ > > That seems to me to go a little too far towards reassuring the user > that the data has probably gone. We want to say two not obviously > conflicting things: > > 1. After rm the data is most probably still there. > > 2. After rm it's probably quite a bit of trouble to recover it. > How about "... it might be possible, but not easy, to recover ..."? Cheers, ..C..
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
