At Monday 26 April 2010, Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that's needed because otherwise the shell function would > > end up calling itself recursively, since it's named `mv' too. > > You use "command mv" for that. > Good point, I forgot about that. And it works for shell builtins too. Using "command mv" seems indeed the optimal choice.
Regards,
Stefano
