Thank you very much for your prompt answer and very valuable info! I did try to surf the web for info before asking you, but I did not find your excellent FAQ link though.
My company's Linux has an ARG_MAX value of 128K, as compared to the (probable - I never had a reason to check it then) 2M limit for the Solaris OS we used to work with - seems a number of the commercial Unix variants noticed the advantage of a larger limit. The Solaris value seemed to be enough for what I was doing then and would most probably be enough for what I am doing now. Hopefully, our next Linux Service Pack might involve a recompiled kernel with an increased value, for simplicity and to avoid changing too much in our build environment etc. I'll talk to our Linux team. Thanks again, Regards, Elisabet Wahlgren -----Original Message----- From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] Sent: den 15 september 2010 18:51 To: Elisabet Wahlgren Cc: 7...@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#7036: ls, mv, etc on LINUX On 09/15/2010 09:02 AM, Elisabet Wahlgren wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Greatly surprised (and not very happy) that my attempts to list or move files > satisfying a file name pattern (like ls *.tgz for example) fail miserably on > my linux machine, when the number of files satisfying the pattern is large. > Error message example: "/bin/mv: Argument list too long". Is this a bug or a > feature, would you know? Feature of your OS, and a FAQ: http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#Argument-list-too-long > > I used to work with a Unix version (Solaris) quite a number of years > (decades) and cannot remember having seen this limitation before. Solaris has the same problem - it's just that you never presented it with enough data to reach the limit. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
