On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: Hi Professor Eggert, > Anyway, perhaps Chen can review them (I don't have time > to test them right now). I'll look at it as soon as Savannah's back up; I never actually pulled from coreutils after the original patch was submitted. Professor Eggert, could you detail how you can trigger the divide-by-zero bug?
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Chen Guo
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Paul Eggert
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Jim Meyering
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Paul Eggert
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Jim Meyering
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Paul Eggert
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Jim Meyering
- bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to... Paul Eggert
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort Jim Meyering
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort Paul Eggert
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort Chen Guo
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort Paul Eggert
- bug#7489: [PATCH] sort: fix bug on 64-bit hosts with at ... Paul Eggert
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort Paul Eggert
