On 01/22/2013 12:23 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 01/22/2013 10:43 AM, Marcel Böhme wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> There is another bug that sneaked into the speed patch of seq on 13.09.12: >> >> 560 if (all_digits_p (argv[optind]) >> 561 && (n_args == 1 || all_digits_p (argv[optind + 1])) >> 562 && (n_args < 3 || STREQ ("1", argv[optind + 2])) >> 563 && !equal_width && !format_str && strlen (separator) == 1) >> >> That should probably be: >> 560 if (all_digits_p (argv[optind]) >> 561 && (n_args == 1 || all_digits_p (argv[optind + 1])) >> 562 && (n_args < 3 || STREQ ("1", argv[optind + 1])) >> 563 && !equal_width && !format_str && strlen (separator) == 1) > > Sigh we really messed up seq in that release :( > The attached should fix it: > One minor typo in commit message:
> [SNIP] > > * tests/misc/seq.pl: Add a test foro this case. > s/foro/for/ Regards, Stefano