I do not have auditing nor selinux incorporated, nor do I really want to.
Seems like glibc relying on having a specific security model loaded would seem to be a bug. I.e. It should work on normal linux security without extra security modules configed. BTW I specifically try to specify differences between my installation and standard in case they do contribute to any problems. It wouldn't be in my interest to complicate issues by hiding such details. Whether or not they 'should' be relevant is another matter though.... That's why i try to operate with vanilla objects of some things (kernels being most common) in my installation as a bellwether for compatibility.
