Am 26.10.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Pádraig Brady: > On 26/10/15 18:35, Thomas Güttler wrote: >> Am 26.10.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Pádraig Brady: >>> On 26/10/15 14:26, Thomas Güttler wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 26.10.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Pádraig Brady: >>>>> >>>>> I've not sure there is enough distinct actions within timeout(1) to >>>>> warrant --verbose? >>>>> How about doing this in the script? >>>>> >>>>> timeout 1s ping localhost >>>>> test $? = 124 && echo { 'ping timed out'; exit 1; } > > I meant: > > test $? = 124 && { echo 'ping timed out' >&2; exit 1; } > >>>> The issue was already closed with "wontfix". This leads me to the >>>> conclusion that your are not interested in my answer. >>>> >>>> Was your "How about doing this in the script?" really a question? >>> >>> We can always reopen if necessary. >> >> Who decides if it necessary or not? What needs to be done >> to reopen it? > > This is an open process. > bug control details are at: > https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html
OK, now I know which software you use to handle the issues. Thank you. Since we both have different opinions, what to do next? Is there a escalation workflow guide line? Regards, Thomas Güttler -- http://www.thomas-guettler.de/