On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > On 09/06/2016 08:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >> Will push later. > > > Before pushing, can you please change the name of "sigs" back to "sig"? I > prefer the old name, as "sig[i]" clearly means "signal i", whereas "sigs[i]" > is more confusing. (This is one of my pet peeves about array names.) Thanks.
I agree. A good argument for "why?" is that we optimize for readability of the more frequent use with an index, sig[i], rather than for the sole declaration, or the less frequent uses of the array name without an index.
